Let some representatives from our high leadership liked the architectural species of European houses, but this is not a reason for creating priority conditions by individual Western projects only on the basis that they are not Russian. In addition, you also do not need to forget that the buildings should not only be beautiful, but also safe. And liberal games are inappropriate in such a field as construction.
To harmonize our design and construction rules and norms with European ones, of course, it is necessary. It is only necessary to understand that this process is not momentary and rather complicated. And today, what is there to hide, it does not go at all as we would like, both in qualitative and quantitatively. This is where help is necessary from the authorities-legislative and executive. But instead of directing their efforts to support the construction sphere and advanced training for rule -making personnel, as well as fully finance the groups that actualize GOSTs and SNiPs and their harmonization with the euro codes, individual high leaders want to get everything at once. Of course, it is easier and easier to give a green light for overseas projects of re -application.
No, we are not against Western projects. And no one doubts that many of them can be built by wonderful modern buildings. And the problem is that for all foreign projects – for only one belonging to them – it is obviously created much more comfortable competitive conditions, unlike our projects. At the same time, the process of developing Russian architecture receives serious interference. But with him, we are not so far away with us ..
Leave a Reply