I agree with you that let’s with a joint efforts we will throw the frame of the future state structure of Rusa. Also, in order to move on to the specifics, let’s start from your 7 points, which are just the most common and formulated. And then it is already possible to carry out their details and decomposition as needed. The only thing that in my opinion should be reformulated in the root is paragraph 6 (in relation to referenda is a dangerous option that, in my opinion, will be realized in our realities after 3 years and after 33). I will deploy more details later. But in general, at the remaining paragraphs 1-5, 7. I’ll comment, again a little later, each of them in detail. In the meantime, I will only propose a further mechanism of dialogue. You have raised questions of mainly ideology and future device that answer the questions “that?”. So far we will limit ourselves. This is a kind of “specification of user requirements” or TK, if you like. Its development will be its development, only with the aim of answering the question “how?”(functional aspects) and” how?”(detailed aspects).Developing primary issues from the series “What?”I can not help much, besides discussion. Still, here the advantage should be for specialized specialists. But functional and detailed planning I can contribute to “lay out on the shelves” already quite professionally, as is customary in general technical practice. We are going to build? So why not use engineering and construction approaches in this matter, speaking of the functional-depth components? I think this is quite reasonable, moreover, almost the only viable approach, with a correction for specific experience, this time by no means humanities. If the RP website becomes a “assembly point” of such a design, then I am ready to participate in every way in this. In the meantime, I will take care of your points.2 kurinnya I see that you also share my fear in relation to “Chukov and Gkov”-well, I believe that overcoming this destructive factor should be prescribed by 8th by 7 mentioned points. In the next post I will try to formulate it. And further. This time already addressing everyone. I do not intend to breed chatter for the sake of self -expression, or something. But for the beginning, you really need to formulate a common idea (or a supervision, while the terminology is not so important, IMHO) and ways to implement it. Speaking of the latter, we will definitely have to cross in real life in the medium term – we need to be ready for this. Therefore, I will ask for diving and mutual jokes (albeit not an admin) in the framework of separate topics, as well as urge you not to fall on “criticism of commas”.The plan will remain a plan (any) if it does not come to search for funds and develop specific solutions for its implementation. And virtual interlocutors cannot do a specific implementation, at least in our age, by definition. I have gone to analyze the analysis I will offer your court.
© gocanadanews.com, 2018-2022. All Rights Reserved.